A securities purchase agreement, often shortened to SPA, is the binding contract that governs the sale of equity or debt securities between a buyer and either the issuing company or an existing shareholder. It sets the price, identifies the type and quantity of securities changing hands, and lays out the conditions each side has to meet before the deal closes. SPAs are the standard document in private financing rounds, venture capital investments, and certain acquisitions where shares transfer outside a public exchange. Most of the negotiation time goes into provisions the parties hope never to use, because those are the ones that decide who bears the loss if something later turns out not to be as promised.
What an SPA Does
At its core, an SPA legally commits one party to deliver securities and the other to deliver money. That sounds simple, but the document does several things a handshake or a signed term sheet cannot. It fixes the purchase price so neither side can renegotiate after signing. It creates enforceable obligations backed by contractual remedies if something goes wrong. And it defines, in granular detail, exactly what “goes wrong” means for this particular deal.
A term sheet outlines the business deal in broad strokes and is almost always non-binding. The SPA is where those broad strokes become enforceable commitments. It also differs from a shareholders’ agreement, which governs how owners interact with each other after the transaction closes — voting rights, board seats, transfer restrictions. The SPA governs the transaction itself.
Primary Issuance vs. Secondary Sale
SPAs come in two flavors depending on where the securities originate. In a primary issuance, the company itself sells newly created securities to raise capital. The money flows directly to the company, and the transaction typically involves detailed representations about the company’s financial condition and operations, because the buyer is investing in the business going forward. In a secondary sale, an existing shareholder sells their stake to a new buyer. The company receives no proceeds, but it usually must approve the transfer through mechanisms like a right of first refusal. Representations in a secondary SPA lean more heavily on the seller’s ownership and authority to sell rather than the company’s internal condition.
The Core Deal Terms
The front end of any SPA identifies exactly what is being bought and sold. This section specifies the type of security — common stock, Series A preferred, convertible notes, or something else — the number of shares or the principal amount of debt, and the price per security. That per-unit price, multiplied by the quantity, produces the total consideration the buyer owes.1Legal Information Institute. Stock Purchase Agreement
The agreement also specifies how payment happens. Most private deals require a cash wire transfer, but some allow consideration in the form of other assets, intellectual property, or existing securities. Finally, this section sets the closing date, time, and location where ownership formally transfers and the purchase price is delivered. In many venture financings, signing and closing happen simultaneously. Larger or more complex transactions often build in a gap between the two to allow time for regulatory approvals and other housekeeping.
Representations and Warranties
This is where most of the negotiating energy goes. Representations and warranties are statements of fact about the company, the securities, and the parties. The seller typically represents that the company’s financial statements are accurate, that there are no undisclosed lawsuits or liabilities, that the company owns its intellectual property, and that the securities being sold are validly issued. The buyer makes a narrower set of representations, usually confirming it has the authority and funds to close.
These provisions do two jobs at once. First, they force disclosure. Negotiating which representations the seller will make flushes out problems the buyer might not have found during due diligence. Second, they allocate risk. If a representation turns out to be false and the buyer suffers a loss because of it, the buyer has a contractual claim for that loss. The remedy is typically financial compensation through the indemnification provisions rather than unwinding the entire deal.
Experienced negotiators distinguish between “general” representations (financial statements, tax compliance, material contracts) and “fundamental” representations (ownership of the securities, authority to enter the agreement, valid existence of the company). Fundamental representations carry higher stakes because they go to the very essence of the deal, and they receive different treatment when it comes to caps and survival periods.
Disclosure Schedules
Disclosure schedules are the companion document that make representations and warranties work in practice. They are a separate exhibit attached to the SPA where the seller lists exceptions to its representations. If the seller represents that there is no pending litigation but the company actually has one minor lawsuit, the seller discloses that lawsuit on the corresponding schedule. Doing so keeps the seller out of breach, and the buyer takes the deal knowing that issue exists.
Schedules do different work depending on which side of the table you sit on. For the seller, they are a liability shield. Any fact properly disclosed on a schedule generally cannot form the basis of an indemnification claim later, because the buyer agreed to the deal with full knowledge of it. For the buyer, the schedules function as an advanced due diligence tool, surfacing details about the company that would be impractical to include in the agreement itself.
Deals quietly fall apart here. The seller’s legal team spends significant time populating these schedules, and a buyer reviewing them sometimes discovers problems serious enough to renegotiate the price or walk away. Incomplete or sloppy schedules are one of the most common sources of post-closing disputes, because the seller thought it disclosed enough and the buyer disagreed.
The Gap Between Signing and Closing
When there is a gap between signing and closing, covenants govern what the parties can and cannot do during that interim period. The goal is to preserve the business in roughly the same condition the buyer evaluated when it agreed to the price.
Affirmative covenants require the seller to keep running the business normally. Negative covenants restrict the seller from taking actions that could change the deal’s value, such as:
- Taking on major new debt that would change the company’s financial profile.
- Issuing additional equity that would dilute the buyer’s incoming ownership stake.
- Selling significant assets outside the ordinary course of business.
- Entering unusual contracts or making capital commitments above a negotiated threshold.
Closing conditions are the prerequisites each party must satisfy before the other is required to go through with the deal. The most common is a “bring-down” condition requiring the seller’s representations and warranties to remain true at closing, not just on the date the SPA was signed. Other typical conditions include obtaining third-party consents from lenders, landlords, or key customers with change-of-control provisions; securing any required regulatory approvals; and confirming that no material adverse change has occurred in the business since signing. If a closing condition is not satisfied, the non-breaching party can usually walk away without liability.
Material Adverse Change Clauses
The material adverse change clause, often called a MAC, is one of the few provisions that lets a buyer exit a signed deal. A MAC clause defines a category of events so damaging to the company that the buyer should not be forced to close at the original price. Most MAC definitions include carve-outs that protect the seller from broader market forces. A general stock market decline or an industry-wide regulatory change typically does not count as a MAC. But if such an event hits the target company disproportionately compared to its competitors, many MAC clauses swing back in the buyer’s favor. These provisions are heavily negotiated because they sit at the boundary between deal certainty and deal flexibility.
Indemnification: Baskets, Caps, and Survival
Indemnification is what gives teeth to the representations and warranties. After the deal closes, if the buyer discovers a representation was false and suffers a financial loss as a result, the indemnification provisions define how the buyer gets compensated and how much it can recover.
Baskets and Caps
To prevent the seller from facing a claim over every minor inaccuracy, the parties negotiate financial guardrails. A “basket” is a minimum threshold of losses the buyer must accumulate before it can bring a claim at all. Two varieties are common. A deductible basket works like an insurance deductible: the seller pays only for losses that exceed the threshold. A tipping basket flips once total losses cross the threshold, making the seller responsible for the entire amount from the first dollar, not just the excess.
The “cap” sets a ceiling on the seller’s total indemnification exposure for breaches of general representations and warranties, commonly negotiated as a percentage of the purchase price. Breaches of fundamental representations, fraud, and certain specific indemnities such as tax liabilities typically sit outside the cap, exposing the seller to the full purchase price or even uncapped liability.
Survival Periods
Indemnification claims cannot be brought indefinitely. A survival period sets the window during which a party can assert a claim for breach. General representations and warranties commonly survive for 12 to 18 months after closing. Fundamental representations receive longer survival periods, often tied to the applicable statute of limitations or set at five to six years. Once a survival period expires, the corresponding representations effectively vanish, and neither party can seek recovery for those particular claims. For the seller, that expiration provides finality. For the buyer, the countdown creates urgency to identify and assert problems promptly.
Securities Law Compliance
Most SPAs involve unregistered securities sold through private placements, which means the transaction has to fit within a federal exemption from the Securities Act’s registration requirements. The most commonly used exemption is Regulation D, particularly Rules 506(b) and 506(c).
Regulation D
Rule 506(b) allows a company to raise an unlimited amount of capital without registering the securities, provided it does not use general solicitation or advertising to find investors. It permits sales to an unlimited number of accredited investors and up to 35 non-accredited investors, though including non-accredited investors triggers additional disclosure obligations.2U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Private Placements – Rule 506(b) Rule 506(c) permits general solicitation but requires that all purchasers be accredited investors and that the company take reasonable steps to verify their status.
An individual qualifies as an accredited investor by meeting either an income test or a net worth test. The income threshold is more than $200,000 individually, or $300,000 jointly with a spouse or domestic partner, in each of the two most recent years, with a reasonable expectation of reaching the same level in the current year. The net worth threshold is more than $1,000,000, excluding the value of a primary residence.3U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Accredited Investors Holders of certain professional certifications, such as Series 7, 65, or 82 licenses, also qualify regardless of their financial situation.
Form D and State Filings
After the first sale of securities in a Regulation D offering, the issuing company must file a Form D notice with the SEC within 15 calendar days. For this purpose, the “first sale” is the date on which the first investor becomes irrevocably committed to invest. If the deadline falls on a weekend or holiday, it moves to the next business day.4U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Filing a Form D Notice
Federal compliance is only half the picture. Most states require their own “blue sky” notice filings, even for offerings that qualify under Regulation D. These typically involve submitting a copy of the federal Form D, a consent to service of process, a state-specific form, and a filing fee. Deadlines and fee structures vary considerably from state to state. Sending a pitch deck or having a single conversation with a potential investor in a given state can trigger that state’s filing requirements, even if the company has no physical presence there.
Tax Provisions Buyers Watch For
Two federal tax provisions frequently intersect with securities purchase agreements, and missing the deadlines on either one can be costly.
Section 83(b) Elections for Restricted Stock
When a buyer receives stock that is subject to vesting or other restrictions, common in founder and employee equity deals, the default tax treatment postpones income recognition until the restrictions lapse. At that point, the recipient pays ordinary income tax on the difference between what they paid for the stock and its fair market value at vesting. If the company’s value has grown significantly, the tax bill can be enormous.
A Section 83(b) election lets the recipient choose to pay tax at the time of transfer instead, based on the stock’s value on the transfer date. If the stock is worth little at that point, as is typical in early-stage companies, the upfront tax is minimal, and all future appreciation is taxed at capital gains rates when the stock is eventually sold.5Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 26 USC 83 – Property Transferred in Connection With Performance of Services The catch is the deadline. The election must be filed within 30 days of the property transfer and cannot be revoked.6Internal Revenue Service. Form 15620 – Section 83(b) Election Missing that 30-day window is irreversible, and it happens more often than it should.
Qualified Small Business Stock
Section 1202 of the Internal Revenue Code offers a significant tax benefit for investors who acquire stock directly from a qualifying small business. If the stock is held for at least the required period and the company meets certain criteria, including being a domestic C corporation with gross assets under $50 million at the time of issuance, a portion or all of the capital gain on sale may be excluded from federal income tax. For stock acquired after September 27, 2010, the exclusion can reach 100% of the gain, subject to a per-issuer limit of the greater of $10 million or ten times the investor’s adjusted basis in the stock. SPAs for early-stage investments often include representations confirming the company’s eligibility for QSBS treatment, precisely because the tax benefit can be worth millions of dollars to the buyer.
Where Deals Get Contentious
Knowing the anatomy of an SPA is useful, but understanding where deals actually get contested is more practical. A few provisions absorb a disproportionate share of the negotiation.
The scope of representations is one. Sellers want narrow, heavily qualified representations; buyers want broad, unqualified ones. Every “material” or “to the company’s knowledge” qualifier inserted into a representation shifts risk toward the buyer.
Basket size and type is another. The choice between a tipping basket and a deductible basket, and the dollar amount of either, directly determines how much post-closing protection the buyer actually has.
The indemnification cap is a third. Sellers push for lower caps. Buyers argue that a cap set too low makes the representations meaningless, because the remedy for breach is capped below the likely damage.
Survival periods come next. Shorter periods favor sellers by limiting the window for claims. Buyers push for longer periods, especially for representations covering issues like tax or environmental liabilities that may take years to surface.
Finally, the definition of material adverse change. The breadth of the MAC definition and its carve-outs can determine whether the buyer has a realistic exit if the company’s condition deteriorates between signing and closing.
Every one of these provisions interacts with the others. A seller who agrees to a broad set of representations might insist on a low cap and short survival period to limit real exposure. A buyer who accepts a high basket might demand that fundamental representations survive indefinitely. The final document reflects whatever balance the parties’ relative leverage allows.